{"id":11514,"date":"2020-10-05T16:06:01","date_gmt":"2020-10-05T10:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mcq-questions.com\/?p=11514"},"modified":"2022-03-02T11:21:17","modified_gmt":"2022-03-02T05:51:17","slug":"ncert-solutions-for-class-9-social-science-civics-chapter-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mcq-questions.com\/ncert-solutions-for-class-9-social-science-civics-chapter-2\/","title":{"rendered":"NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 2 What is Democracy? Why Democracy?"},"content":{"rendered":"

What is Democracy? Why Democracy? Class 9 Questions and Answers Provided helps you to answer complex Questions too easily. You can use them while preparing for board exams and all of them are given by subject experts. Reading NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science<\/a> Civics Chapter 2 What is Democracy? Why Democracy? familiarizes you with the kind of questions appearing in the board exams. Students are advised to read these solutions on a regular basis to score well.<\/p>\n

What is Democracy? Why Democracy? Class 9 Questions and Answers Civics Chapter 2<\/h2>\n

Make your learning experience enjoyable by preparing from the quick links available on this page. Use the Class 9 SST Civics Chapter 2 NCERT Solutions and get to know different concepts involved. All the Solutions are covered as per the latest syllabus guidelines. Knowing the NCERT Class 9 Civics Chapter 2 Questions and Answers helps students to attempt the exam with confidence.<\/p>\n

What is Democracy? Why Democracy? NCERT Intext Questions and Answers<\/h3>\n

Question 1.
\nI have heard a different version. Democracy is off the people, far (from) the people and(where they) buy the people. Why don\u2019t we accept that?
\nAnswer:
\nWhen people define democracy in this way, it shows only their hopelessness and frustration. To some extent they are right, we have seen that in some cases democracy does not serve the purpose because it has nothing to do with the welfare of the people. Candidates buy votes by dint of their money and muscle power. But we should not be hopeless. There are exceptions too. So we don\u2019t need to give much attention to the above definition of democracy. Democracy has always been a better government than other forms of government. It gives people basic political rights and freedom of expression.<\/p>\n

Question 2.
\nAll this is so remote for me. Is democracy all about rulers and governments? Can we talk about a democratic classroom? Or a democratic family?
\nAnswer:
\nDemocracy is not all about rulers and governments. Democracy is a principle that can be applied to any sphere of life. We can have democratic classrooms where teachers give students the freedom of asking questions without hesitation or fear, where a good interaction takes place between teachers and students, where teachers instead of creating panic among students maintain pleasant environment in the classroom.<\/p>\n

Democracy can be seen in families also. We can have democratic families where parents or elders do not impose their decisions on their children or younger members. All the family members should sit down and arrive at a common consensus. Children\u2019s opinion should matter as much as their parents\u2019. In this way, democracy can be applied everywhere.<\/p>\n

\"NCERT<\/p>\n

Question 3.
\nWhy talk about Zimbabwe? In read similar reports from many parts of our own country? Why don\u2019t we discuss that?
\nAnswer:
\nZimbabwe gained independence in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by Robert Mugabe. Elections have been held regularly and always won by his party named ZANU-PF. President Mugabe is popular no doubt but he also uses unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government has changed the Constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.<\/p>\n

There are independent newspapers by the government harasses those journalists who go against it. The example of Zimbabwe shows that popular approval of the rulers is necessary in a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. A democratic government is not expected to do whatever it likes, simply because it has won the election. It has to respect some basic rules.<\/p>\n

Whatever is going on in Zimbabwe under the leadership of Robert Mugabe, is not limited to that country only. Similar reports are heard in our country also. Whenever elections are held some candidates with criminal backgrounds try to use unfair means to make their position safe. Sometimes violence and money power are also used in elections. However, the number of such incidents are decreasing as elections are becoming fairer.<\/p>\n

Question 4.
\nI want to be in Lyngdoh Madam\u2019s class! That sounds like a democratic classroom. Doesn\u2019t it?
\nAnswer:
\nLyngdoh Madam is of democratic temperament. In her classroom students can speak their own minds. They are free to put forth their arguments. Lyngdoh Madam warns the students not to accept something just because it is famous, just because everyone else accepts it. Students enjoy the teaching of such a teacher. So, the girl here wants to be in this teacher\u2019s class.<\/p>\n

\"NCERT<\/p>\n

Question 5.
\nWhat would have happened of India was not a democracy? Could we have stayed together as a single nation?
\nAnswer:
\nWe would not have stayed together as a single nation of India was not a democracy. The prime reason is that India is a country of many diversities. People of different religions, languages, cultures live here. If there was no democracy then all the people could not have followed their religions and customs in their own way. In such a condition there was a fair chance of conflict between different religious and linguistic groups. Minorities would have been oppressed by the majority in the absence of democracy. It is only democracy that ensures protection to its citizens irrespective of their religion, caste, status, gender, etc. It also brings order in society and binds people together.<\/p>\n

Check Your Progress<\/strong><\/p>\n

Question 1.
\nRibiang went back home and collected some more famous quotations on democracy. This time she did not mention the names of the people who said or wrote these. She wants you to read these and comment on how good or useful these thoughts are:
\n(a) Democracy gives every man the right to be his own oppressor.
\n(b) Democracy consists of choosing your dictators after they\u2019ve told you what you think it is you want to hear.
\n(c) Man\u2019s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man\u2019s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary.
\n(d) Democracy is a device that insures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.
\n(e) All the ills of democracy can be cured by more democracy.
\nAnswer:
\nThe first and second thoughts indicate the same point. They tell about those forms of government in which people have the right to choose their ruler without having options. It means that they are bound to elect the candidate only from the ruling party.<\/p>\n

The third thought suggests that if man accepts justice, then democracy is possible, but if he follows injustice, democracy is necessary to ensure justice to others.<\/p>\n

The fourth thought suggests that democracy can work in a better way if we are aware citizens and help in its functioning. The fifth thought suggests that if we want true democracy, we should work for the removal of all the ills that come in its way.<\/p>\n

\"NCERT<\/p>\n

Question 2.
\nRead these five examples of working or denial of democracy. Match each of these with the relevant features of democracy discussed above.
\nAnswer:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Example<\/strong><\/td>\nFeature<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
King of Bhutan has declared that in future he will be guided by the advice given to him by elected representatives.<\/td>\nRule of Law<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Many Tamil workers who migrated from India were not given a right to vote in Sri Lanka.<\/td>\nRespect for rights<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The King of Nepal imposed a ban on political gatherings, demonstrations and rallies.<\/td>\nOne person, one vote, one value.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Indian Supreme Court held that the dissolution of Bihar assembly was unconstitutional.<\/td>\nFree and fair electoral competition<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Political parties in Bangladesh have agreed that a neutral government should rule the country at the time of elections.<\/td>\nMajor decisions by elected leaders<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

(i) (e),(ii) (c), (iii) (b), (iv) (a), (v)(d)<\/p>\n

Question 3.
\nRajesh and Muzaffar read an article. It showed that no democracy has ever gone to war with another democracy. Wars takes place only when one of the two governments is non- democratic. The article said that this was a great merit of democracy. After reading the essay, Rajesh and Muzaffar had different reactions. Rajesh said that this was not a good argument for democracy. It was just a matter of chance. It is possible that in future democracies may have wars. Muzaffar said that it could not be a matter of chance. Democracies take decisions in such a way that it reduces the chances of war. Which of the two positions do you agree with and why?
\n(i) – e (ii) – c (iii) – b (iv) – a (v) – d
\nAnswer:
\nI do agree with Muzaffar\u2019s position. Democracies take decisions in such a way that it reduces the chances of war. It provides a method to deal with differences and conflicts. That is why, it is considered the best form of government.<\/p>\n

Civics Class 9 Chapter 2 NCERT Textbook Questions and Answers<\/h3>\n

Question 1.
\nHere is some information about four countries. Based on this information how would you classify each of these countries? Write \u2018democratic\u2019 \u2018undemocratic\u2019 or \u2018not sure\u2019 against each of these.
\n(a) Country A: People who do not accept the country\u2019s official religion do not have a right to vote.
\n(b) Country B: The same party has been winning elections for the last twenty years.
\n(c) Country C: Ruling party has lost in the last three elections.
\n(d) Country D: There is no independent election commission.
\nAnswer:
\n(a) Undemocratic
\n(b) Not sure
\n(c) Democratic
\n(d) Undemocratic<\/p>\n

\"NCERT<\/p>\n

Question 2.
\nHere is some information about four countries. Based on this information how would you classify each of these countries. Write \u2018democratic\u2019 \u2018undemocratic\u2019 or \u2018not sure\u2019 against each of these.
\n(a) Country P: The parliament cannot pass a law about the army without the consent of the Chief of Army.
\n(b) Country Q: The parliament cannot pass a law reducing the powers of the judiciary.
\n(c) Country R: The country\u2019s leaders cannot sign any treaty with another country without taking permission from its neighbouring country.
\n(d) Country S: All the major economic decisions about the country are taken by officials of the central bank which the ministers cannot change.
\nAnswer:
\n(a) Undemocratic
\n(b) Undemocratic
\n(c) Undemocratic
\n(d) Undemocratic<\/p>\n

Question 3.
\nWhich of these is not a good argument in favour of democracy? Why?
\n(a) People feel free and equal in a democracy.
\n(b) Democracies resolve conflict in a better way than others.
\n(c) Democratic government is more accountable to the people.
\n(d) Democracies are more prosperous than others.
\nAnswer:
\n(d) This argument that democracies are more prosperous than others is not a good one in favour of democracy because prosperity of the people has nothing to do with the form of government. Sometimes a good monarch can be more concerned with the welfare of his subjects and can work hard to make his country more prosperous than some of the democracies, where different political parties and their leaders are always indulged in fight with each other which ultimately drag their country on the path of poverty. Thus, democracies may be more prosperous than others but not all the time. It all depends on the goodness and sacrifice of the leaders\/rulers.<\/p>\n

Question 4.
\nEach of these statements contains a democratic and an undemocratic element. Write out the two separately for each statement.
\n(a) A minister said that some laws have to be passed by the parliament in order to conform to the regulations decided by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
\n(b) The Election Commission ordered re-poling in a constituency where large-scale rigging was reported.
\n(c) Women\u2019s representation in the parliament has barely reached 10 per cent. This led women\u2019s organisations to demand one-third seats for women.
\nAnswer:
\n(a)<\/p>\n